Talk:Nigel Tufnel

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Film

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Tufnell?[edit]

Are we definitively sure that Tufnel has only one L? I'm not sure. ElectricRay 09:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088258/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.152.24 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crappy Formatting[edit]

I'll start now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.5.134.228 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven[edit]

In this short article, the 'going to 11' thing is mentioned four separate times. I guess the article itself is trying to go to 11. Wasted Time R 01:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article is a wreck. It has no place in an encyclopedia.PurpleChez (talk) 00:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Beck[edit]

Nigel Tufnel is obviously modeled after Jeff Beck. Why this isn't mentioned on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.25.45.6 (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide a source for that, then please add it to the article. Mjworthey (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my source-11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.53.4 (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

Basically a good article. Unlike a lot of pop culture articles it doesn't get bogged down in an avalanche of in-jokes. But some of the info is presented in-universe, as if Nigel were a real person. PurpleChez (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]